nine months and
nine days ago, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration streamed a live meeting about biological products and vaccines. The duration of the stream was about
nine hours long! And yes, I do plan on watching 'The Nines' again after this post to see if I can derive even more madness from the M3M3ING!
That aside, the bit in question is where Steven Anderson, director of biostatistics and epidemiology, appears to be in the middle of narrating his PowerPoint presentation about FDA's near-real-time surveillance and monitoring the alleged "safety" of the vaccine. Now that's just a coded way of saying monitoring for adverse effects like Guillain-Barré syndrome. If you think about it, that sounds a lot "safer" to speak to the safety of something instead of keeping an eye out for vaccine-damaged people. Doesn't it?
Keeping an eye out for vaccine-damaged people would almost suggest that FDA knew what was about to happen. I mean, you don't think that the good folks at FDA would have suppressed foreknowledge of the adverse events to come, would they? After all, just seven weeks and four days after this live stream, the Pfizer vaccine got rolled out thanks to the FDA's emergency use authorization.
However, the screenshot shown near the top of this article shows a discarded frame that you weren't supposed to catch—but now I've thrown it to you. You see, as Steven was rapidly cycling through his PowerPoint presentation, a draft page showing possible adverse event outcomes magically appeared on the screen for just shy of half a second, or about 380 milliseconds to be precise. And almost just as soon as it came into view, the image magically vanished due to Mr. Anderson's cat-like reflexes.
I mean, I don't know. Maybe Steven is the fucking Neo of PowerPoint? Surely the ladies don't complain about his fast fingerwork. And I say that because he damn sure ain't taking the blue pill. By the looks of this secret adverse events list, this guy is red-pilled AF, and I bet the codger doesn't want to wake up with priapism anyway.
I jest, and I only give this Mr. Anderson (bastard) a hard time because he works for the Agent Smiths of this world. Somewhere along the chain of events, the timeline got skewed because he up and decided to work for Evil Corp. A company with a revolving door situation going on with the assholes at big pharma. This open secret is an unimaginably massive conflict of interest. As a point of fact, it should be highly illegal for those employed at pharmaceutical companies to get employment at the FDA or vice versa.
So let us add up the damage of giving out this EUA to companies like Pfizer while keeping potential adverse reactions on the low-low. In this video here, you can see Dr. David Bauer of the Francis Crick Institute. Bauer is a prestigious scientist and also a Rhodes scholar. In short, what I'm hinting at is that he's got cred.
David has discovered that when people receive their second dose of Pfizer's mRNA injection, their "gold standard" neutralizing antibodies are cut by 5-6 fold. Seeing that one's "Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection," to take these antibodies and divide them by six is fucking devastating, to say the least of it. It means that after the double-tap, you're far more likely to get laid out by the wild virus or any variants that follow.
In my opinion, which may be correct or incorrect, Pfizer has essentially given these people AIDS as it pertains to SARS-CoV-2. And this is a colossal potential cash cow. What we're talking about here is the old problem, reaction, solution bit.
The problem is that these corporations need to make money. The pharmaceutical company reacts to this problem by creating "a cure" to a disease that causes an even bigger disaster. However, if Pfizer can fix its mess with boosters that protect people from SARS-CoV-2, they'll have lifelong customers. Never mind that they gave these people Corona-AIDS in the first place because they'll probably be the only ones able to treat it.
It's commonly known in some circles that these companies would much rather have lifelong customers and steadily treat chronic disease as opposed to curing it. But the highly disgusting part about the whole scenario is that the chronic disease that they'll treat is one that they created. And instead of being held responsible for what they did, they'll go down in history as saviors. Not if I have anything to do with it.
The CDC had only recently warned about myocarditis and pericarditis side effects. And as I look at the way back machine, it appears that their publication of the said warning happened on or around May 30th, 2021. I wonder if good old Mr. Anderson here passed along the memo, or if this kind of thing gets kept secret to help line the pockets of companies like Pfizer.
|Guillain-Barré syndrome||Acute disseminated encephaloymelitis|
|Stroke||Narcolepsy and cataplexy|
|Anaphlyaxis||Acute myocardial infarction|
|Deaths||Pregnancy and birth outcomes|
|Other acute demyelinating diseases||Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions|
|Thrombocytopenia||Disseminated intravascular coagulation|
|Venous thromboembolism||Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain|
|Kawasaki disease||Vaccine enhanced disease|
In closing, Mr. Anderson had at least seven weeks and four days to give the CDC ample warning that pericarditis and myocarditis were a potential risk with the mRNA shots. I thought that Neo was supposed to be the good guy? But maybe he was a good guy? Perhaps he secretly wanted to warn people but was stopped by his chain of command every step of the way. Could it be that this millisecond "mishap" was a covert attempt to do a good deed? Inquiring minds want to know.
If you want to blow the whistle for posterity, be brave!
P.S. After writing this, I realized that an additional potential adverse event was
"disseminated intravascular coagulation." That's right, blood clots, and this is happening too! Click on this link to learn more!